Howto Clean Icicles From Roof

Filoti accuses me of wanting to persecute the figure of his father Camillo Monaco. Salvatore

....

Filoti course the friend has the right and power to say what he thinks and I will always love her accommodate my writings in this area.
-reference the allegations addressed to the sender with the script at the bottom of this post and return to say that I have nothing personal against Camillo Monaco, but as a free citizen oritano I can not resign myself to the idea that we want to continue not to clarity about all that happened 150 years ago.

I'm not doubting the good things that made the Monaco but I want to understand what it would stain them Oritani those three who died that day of Passover. I do not want revisionism, I will not rewrite history, but I just want to understand and nobody can take away the right to use any means to tickle many dormant consciences. Honestly I think it is absurd .... absurd to know that there are a lot of historical texts that describe in detail the past events occurring in Oria many centuries ago and not instead have a single line to be handed down to posterity on what happened just 150 years ago.

Am I not free to be able to remember the death of those three people ..... torn from their loved ones for reasons still unclear?

abusive towards me I find this attitude (the only one actually) whenever I highlight this anomaly. I understand the resentment of his Filoti as a descendant of Camillo Monaco, but in his place, and other descendants of that, living or dead, I would have long since made public (by giving it to the press) all the existing material in their personal archives. Everyone is free to form their own idea. Not continue to do so inevitably raises doubts about the good faith ... at least people like me.

Almost always the story in the past was not written by peasants and artisans who cites Filoti friend, but from middle class and educated according to what was their point of view.
am firmly convinced that even in relation to what I discovered and wrote in a post about the change made in 1966 or 1967 to the original text of the historical parade and tournament of the districts from cultured person still alive .

In our case, with the exception of the book written by his son Attilio Monaco, we do not have a single line that has been published in the face of so much new material that should be certified (as claimed Filoti) " the work of Camillo Monaco both before the unification of Italy and until his death. "

Filoti I wonder and ask if the reproaches that is moving them to me in public has never even moved to prof. or Dr. Antonio Welcome AMAndriani , which as responsible for the local branch of the Institute for the Italian Risorgimento, in 2006 he wrote a book:

[... ... only a cross-sectional study of the sources could be found to bring out more clearly the figure of Camillo Monaco.
The proposal outlined publishing of his biography by his son, Attilio, enriched Family Tree of Monaco and family Indices of names and places, offering other food for thought, is an invitation to broaden and deepen the research.]

I remind myself that about the absolution (referred to as - full - from Filoti) Camillo Monaco for the death of Pastorelli and Sartorio on Easter Sunday of 1861, Professor. Welcome in 1985 so he wrote:

[The verdict was an acquittal for Monaco and all the other defendants for the following reasons:
- many murders, consumed during those years of political transition, remained unpunished ;
- the case was celebrated after some time of events from occurring;
- exacerbated the bias of witnesses against him and exhaust had harmed the search for truth. ]

I am willing to publish anything for the benefit of the figure of Camillo Monaco Filoti that his friend would send me. I think I've demonstrated that they have done in the past. Similarly
continue to publish any reprimands for me to sign Filoti of his Savior, reserving the right to reply and defend myself against any charges properly as they are today.
course friendship with his friend Salvatore Filoti will remain the same as always!
------------------------


Dear Franco,
this time I must tell you, quite frankly, I do not agree completely on your way to approach the celebrations for the 150th anniversary of the unification of Italy.
In a time when we are culturally and morally retrograde political forces that are allow to question the unification of Italy and would like to bring back the clock of history at times when Italy was enslaved to various types domination dictatorial and basically, I assure you that no one feels the need to create new conflicts and create a sort of nostalgia for a dark period as the Bourbon.

President Napolitano has done well to remember that a true federalism solidarity is possible only within a united country that can not run at two speeds as they would like the proponents of federalism that has a horizon secessionist processes.
Please review the history of Italy in the nineteenth century and if you have the opportunity to also report on the robbery of the sensor. Massari to the Italian Parliament in 1861 to see what was southern Italy in those days and what was the Risorgimento.

I know that even the Savoy are exempt and immune from criticism and have the huge hit from 1860 until 1945 but if you want more about that elsewhere.
But above all, do not really understand What do you want with the celebrations of the Unity of Italy and with real or alleged faults of the Municipal outgoing on your wanting to persecute the figure of Camillo Monaco here.
Besides continuing to use a key to understanding the facts very one-sided, that is what emerges from the indictments of the process, fundamentally based on the testimony of De Angelis forgetting that, subsequently, in the appeal trial, which ended with the full acquittal of Monaco, the fully retracted all his statements and that some witnesses were Bourbons.

I think you've completely lost sight of the climate and context of the facts still steeped in part by hatred and envy political, have also completely lost sight of what happened during the previous Christmas events in which the Bourbons continued to incite many citizens and to provoke hatred and violence.
You also have lost sight of the whole history of Southern Italy and Oria area (maybe if you were to read Peter Palumbo. "Storia di Francavilla" would have much clearer ideas, you should remember how many people ended up in jail thanks to the Bourbons and the behavior of Msgr. Margarita and his henchmen (some of them lost their life as the father of Camillo Monaco: Luigi Leanza). It would also need to check what were the living conditions of peasants and artisans (although the same bourgeoisie that had the Risorgimento can not be entirely blameless).

We also invite you to read what happened in 1809 in Oria on the night of April 13 in which the fault of the instigators Bourbon Oritani dozens of peasants lost their lives to understand what was the political tactics of the Bourbons: create chaos and then blame the faults opponents.
Perhaps it would be helpful if you also speak of the work of Camillo Monaco is the first unification of Italy and until his death, she will be a very different picture from what you propose unilaterally.

All politicians can operate optimally and simultaneously make mistakes but should be judged on the whole of their work.
think if we were to use the point of view of American Indians to judge Columbus and roosters to judge Julius Caesar, and so on ........

Therefore, with the esteem and affection of all time (but friends remain so even in times of discussion and comparison of different opinions) I ask you kindly to publish what you write for complete information.

Salvatore Filoti